Robert Siricos Samaritans Dilemma :: essays research papers

In the essay Samaritans Dilemma, Robert Sirico claims that bounty is non always helpful to society. He implies that some people take advantage of others kindness, in this case, dope kitchens.To support his claim, Sirico told a story of when he was training to be a priest. He states that each Friday he would help set up and litigate a free meal to those in need, usually 200 to 500 people. One Friday after the meal, he and a friend cleaned up then went to a seafood saloon just down the street. While eating the two men realized that the soup kitchen they had just finished working at was competition to the seafood pothouse and other surrounding restaurants. They realized that their charity was making it harder for other entrepreneurs to make a living and provide for their families.Sirico basically states that when people are waited on hired man and foot they become to a greater extent dependant on others, therefore, making it even harder for them to get out of poverty. He also im plies that giving handouts to people encourages laziness. He says, When charity creates a disincentive for an able-bodied person to work, it leads this person down the wrong path. It encourages indolence. Real work provides the individual with the vehicle for a productive and virtuous life. It gives a person self esteem and a role to play in society.The support he uses does not help his case, though. For example, the comparison Sirico makes of the soup kitchen to a seafood pub is irrelevant. He states, "Just a block away we provide a product and a service that make this mans effort to provide for his own family more difficult. A soup kitchen and a seafood pub are not comparable. The pub has the intention to make money, whereas a soup kitchen is not interested in money. soup kitchens are there for the purpose of people who cannot afford to eat at other places. The speaker never states the prices or quality of food at the pub. This info would help the reader recognize the similar ities and differences between the two. Sirico fails to mention the other restaurants that are also the pub owners competition. Surrounding restaurants may be taking business from the pub, not the soup kitchen. In addition, Sirico uses insufficient personal experience to suggest that people are taking advantage of charity. After observing people coming to the soup kitchen, Sirico noticed a couple that "told me they needed to eat quickly because they were planning to go shopping after dinner.